<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Professores Online &#187; pamleme</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.professoronline.net/profile/pamleme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.professoronline.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>pt-BR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Syntax analisys &#8211; análise sintática</title>
		<link>https://www.professoronline.net/syntax-analisys-analise-sintatica/</link>
		<comments>https://www.professoronline.net/syntax-analisys-analise-sintatica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pamleme]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inglês]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analisys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sintática]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professoronline.net/syntax-analisys-analise-sintatica/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[\\\\\\\&#8221;And so for some, the Serbian gunman, whose name is long gone from my memory, had one hundred per cent individual responsibility\\\\\\\&#8221; : ( ) This clause is compound because there two subjects ( ) This is not a clause it is a verb phrase ( ) This is a simple sentence because there is [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\\\\\\\&#8221;And so for some, the Serbian gunman, whose name is long gone from my memory, had one hundred per cent individual responsibility\\\\\\\&#8221; :<br />
( ) This clause is compound because there two subjects<br />
( ) This is not a clause it is a verb phrase<br />
( ) This is a simple sentence because there is just one clause<br />
( ) It is a non-defining relative clause because identifies a noun<br />
( ) It is a defining relative clause and it\\\\\\\&#8217;s not possible to use commas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.professoronline.net/syntax-analisys-analise-sintatica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Análise sintática em inglês (syntax analisys)</title>
		<link>https://www.professoronline.net/analise-sintatica-em-ingles-syntax-analisys/</link>
		<comments>https://www.professoronline.net/analise-sintatica-em-ingles-syntax-analisys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 17:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pamleme]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inglês]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analisys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglês]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sintática]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professoronline.net/analise-sintatica-em-ingles-syntax-analisys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Our parents thought we might be corrupted by one another into becoming whatever it was they most feared: an incorrigible masturbator, a winsome homosexual, a recklessly impregnatory libertine&#8221; ( )There is no indenpendent clause ( ) The sentence is complex because the second clause is dependent ( ) The third clause is a noun clause [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our parents thought we might be corrupted by one another into becoming whatever it was they most feared: an incorrigible masturbator, a winsome homosexual, a recklessly impregnatory libertine&#8221;</p>
<p>( )There is no indenpendent clause</p>
<p>( ) The sentence is complex because the second clause is dependent</p>
<p>( ) The third clause is a noun clause functioning as a object of the &#8221; into becoming&#8221;</p>
<p>( ) The second clause is not object of the first one<br />
&#8221; into becoming&#8221; is a phrase and it cannot demand any object</p>
<p>Alguém sabe a alternativa correta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.professoronline.net/analise-sintatica-em-ingles-syntax-analisys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
